Thursday, 24 December 2015

Re: [7x12minilathe] Re: MT2 Test Bar

 

The test bar in my case needed no "hacking" off the MT end to fit the tailstock.
If you put in a set screw 3/8" x 16 or 10 mm in the threaded hole for the knock out (retraction) 
you should be OK.
The only issues with any # 2 MT´s in a 7 x · lathe is if the tool has a knock out tang.

I have never seen or used a "test bar" with a tang as this is a "metrology" tool not used
for machining and or taking a radial load.

John


On Thursday, December 24, 2015 7:32 AM, "Bill Vance mlt@xpresso.seaslug.org [7x12minilathe]" <7x12minilathe@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 


Thanks guys, those silutions will definitely do the trick.

Bill


__._,_.___

Posted by: John Lindo <bechetboat@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (5)

.

__,_._,___

Wednesday, 23 December 2015

Re: [7x12minilathe] Re: MT2 Test Bar

 



Thanks guys, those silutions will definitely do the trick.

Bill

__._,_.___

Posted by: Bill Vance <mlt@xpresso.seaslug.org>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (4)

.

__,_._,___

[7x12minilathe] Re: MT2 Test Bar

 

The easy way is with the graduations on the TS ram. Seat the bar with the ram fully extended, retract it until the bar starts to eject - the reading on the ram is the amount to cut off. That still leaves a little safety margin because the ram retracts beyond the 0 graduation.


Roy

__._,_.___

Posted by: roylowenthal@yahoo.com
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (3)

.

__,_._,___

Re: [7x12minilathe] MT2 Test Bar

 

Bill, I'll admit to not knowing the answer in numbers, but I had to do one and this is what I did....

I cleaned off the shaft and put a working MT2 in the tailstock so it seated (I think it was one of my drill chucks) and shot it with a little Dychem.  I popped that out and measured it.  Mess was all cleaned up with Dychem solvent and I had the answer.

Warren L

On 12/23/2015 1:10 PM, Bill Vance mlt@xpresso.seaslug.org [7x12minilathe] wrote:
 



I've seen it often enough, but now can't seem to find it.
Assuming I start with an MT2 test bar, how much would I
need to saw off the taper to make it compatable with a
7x* minilathe?

Bill


__._,_.___

Posted by: Warren LeMay <notebook@squarework.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)

.

__,_._,___

[7x12minilathe] MT2 Test Bar

 



I've seen it often enough, but now can't seem to find it.
Assuming I start with an MT2 test bar, how much would I
need to saw off the taper to make it compatable with a
7x* minilathe?

Bill

__._,_.___

Posted by: Bill Vance <mlt@xpresso.seaslug.org>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)

.

__,_._,___

Monday, 21 December 2015

Re: [7x12minilathe] MT3 Test Bar from Ebay.

 

Hi Ian,

When the runout of a straight, constant diameter bar is nil at all points along that bar then the bar is perfectly aligned with the spindle's axis of rotation.  This will perform the same as a test bar which is fitted in the lathe's spindle taper. The part of the bar which the indicator will touch has the same relation to the spindle in either case; it's centered on the spindle's rotation axis - just held differently.

It does take some fiddling to get the arbitrary bar aligned but it's much cheaper than a test bar and a Thomsen bar has equivalent or better specs for roundness, diameter, straightness and surface finish. Since most owners align a lathe infrequently, often only once, the time vs cost tradeoff may be reasonable.

In either case, if the spindle axis is not aligned with the ways then as an indicator mounted on the carriage and zeroed at the headstock end of the bar is traversed along the bar it will read the change in distance between the ways and the spindle axis, i.e. the alignment error.  Depending on whether the indicator finger touches the top or front of the bar it will read the vertical or horizontal error.  Note that if you stop at any point and rotate the spindle there should be no runout if the real test bar or the arbitrary bar held in the chuck is perfectly straight, constant diameter, and perfectly aligned with the spindle axis.   In the real world, where things are seldom perfect,  one can use RDM to reduce the error due to imperfections, but limited by the resolution and accuracy of the readings, of course.

John




---In 7x12minilathe@yahoogroups.com, <ian_new@yahoo.com> wrote :

Hi John,

OK - I'll bite:

The point of using the test bar is to check the alignment of the system.

The process you describe in your post outlines a possible way to get a test bar aligned in a 'less than perfect' three or four jaw chuck.  Doesn't this method assume the axis is already in perfect alignment?

All the best,
Ian


On 21 Dec 2015, at 16:55, "John@GadgetBuilder.com [7x12minilathe]" <7x12minilathe@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

It is fair to point out that unless you're concerned with alignment of the spindle's MT taper to the spindle axis, an accurately ground bar (e.g. 3/4" Thomsen case hardened linear shaft, $12 at ENCO) can provide the same measurements as a more expensive test bar. 

Or if you have an accurately ground bar you can make acceptably accurate measurements for alignment of a 7x12 with that. If you're willing to work at it you can lap a straight 1" round steel bar (preferably a tube), use a 4 jaw and set the runout near the chuck to nil, then set the runout at the far end to 4/10 or less by tapping it in the right direction as you incrementally tighten the jaws. It takes a few minutes to do this but at that point you have the test bar aligned exactly on the spindle axis. This should perform just like a commercial test bar. Of course, you should use RDM to correct for any minor runout remaining, just like when using a real test bar. Or, you could chuck the lapped bar in a 3 jaw, accept a thou or so runout, push the high side on the far end as you tighten the chuck incrementally and get runout to a thou or so, then use RDM - my guess is there will be little difference in results.

More thoughts on 7x12 alignment here:  MiniLathe Alignment   There's more to it than a test bar, a precision level may also be helpful, upping the cost for alignment tools.

 

John

__._,_.___

Posted by: John@GadgetBuilder.com
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (29)

.

__,_._,___

Re: [7x12minilathe] MT3 Test Bar from Ebay.

 

Hi John,

OK - I'll bite:

The point of using the test bar is to check the alignment of the system.

The process you describe in your post outlines a possible way to get a test bar aligned in a 'less than perfect' three or four jaw chuck.  Doesn't this method assume the axis is already in perfect alignment?

All the best,
Ian


On 21 Dec 2015, at 16:55, "John@GadgetBuilder.com [7x12minilathe]" <7x12minilathe@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

It is fair to point out that unless you're concerned with alignment of the spindle's MT taper to the spindle axis, an accurately ground bar (e.g. 3/4" Thomsen case hardened linear shaft, $12 at ENCO) can provide the same measurements as a more expensive test bar. 

Or if you have an accurately ground bar you can make acceptably accurate measurements for alignment of a 7x12 with that. If you're willing to work at it you can lap a straight 1" round steel bar (preferably a tube), use a 4 jaw and set the runout near the chuck to nil, then set the runout at the far end to 4/10 or less by tapping it in the right direction as you incrementally tighten the jaws. It takes a few minutes to do this but at that point you have the test bar aligned exactly on the spindle axis. This should perform just like a commercial test bar. Of course, you should use RDM to correct for any minor runout remaining, just like when using a real test bar. Or, you could chuck the lapped bar in a 3 jaw, accept a thou or so runout, push the high side on the far end as you tighten the chuck incrementally and get runout to a thou or so, then use RDM - my guess is there will be little difference in results.

More thoughts on 7x12 alignment here:  MiniLathe Alignment   There's more to it than a test bar, a precision level may also be helpful, upping the cost for alignment tools.

 

John

__._,_.___

Posted by: Ian Newman <ian_new@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (28)

.

__,_._,___