Monday, 25 August 2014

Re: [Electronics_101] L.C. Checker Test Components Suggestions Needed

 

Inductance depends heavily on test frequency (and amplitude).
In fact an inductor, measured above it's resonant frequency, will behave like a capacitor.
You can see typical capacitor and inductor curves over frequency in the datasheets (or sometimes catalogs).

ST

On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 11:31 PM, vw_beetle_fix_it@yahoo.com [Electronics_101] <Electronics_101@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


Hello

I'm going to order a small assortment of known value components for my "L.C. Checker V2" to make sure it's more or less correct in its readings.


I have a good assortment of capacitors here...(though none are of high tolerance) which I think will do for capacitor side of the thing. If anyone thinks I should get a few precision capacitors (instead of relying my capacitors of unknown quality), please let me know.


The inductors are a different matter.


When it comes to unknown value inductors, would it be a valid statement to say that an "RF choke" will give the same reading as a "transformer type inductor"...when measured on the L.C. Checker?? Or would they be different??


And I need suggestions as to what other value(s) of inductor(s) to order to provide a good test range for the Checker...the only thing I've come up on my own is a 1 Henry inductor (for obvious reasons... 1 Henry should = 1 Henry ). What other values would be good for starters?


I'm going to accept the stated value of all components as 100% correct ...regardless of whatever tolerance may be given for that component; in other words, I'll accept a Henry inductor as a 1 Henry inductor no matter what the stated tolerance is for that particular part.


Can anyone make recommendations as to other inductive and/or capacitive values?


Thanks To All


Patrick


p.s. NOTE: NO TYPO CHECK WAS DONE HERE; please forgive any that are present.




__._,_.___

Posted by: Stefan Trethan <stefan_trethan@gmx.at>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)
Please trim excess when replying

.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment